Author: Admin

SFAA?s Bill to Eliminate Indexing of Miller Act Bond Threshold Passes House in the NDAA

Members should visit Advocacy / General Info (Members) for more information.

The first quarter 2018 Quarterly Results have been posted for Members and Subscribers

Navigate to these reports at Statistics / Statistical Reports: Financial Statement Data / Quarterly Results For Members only, historical quarterly reports have been added back to 2010 Q1.

Non-Members may purchase these reports by completing a Statistical Report Order Form. Click here for a complete list, description, and release schedule of statistical reports.

The
data used to produce these reports have been compiled by both The
Surety & Fidelity Association of America and SNL Financial LC, and
is copyrighted by both The Surety & Fidelity Association of America
and SNL Financial LC. Reproduction in any form in whole or in part is
prohibited without written permission from The Surety & Fidelity
Association of America.

Public:

• 2018-2019 Board of Directors list
• News Release – SFAA Elects Board Members and President

Members:

• Commercial Surety Advisory Committee presentation
• International Advisory Committee presentations
• 2018-2019 Executive Committee list
• 2017-2018 Annual Committee reports (Member Services, Committees …)
• 2018-2019 Advisory Committee Members (Member Services, Committees …)
• Annual Meeting presentations and videos

SFAA Addresses Coverage for Virtual Currency in Money Transmitter License Bond Rules

SFAA submitted comments to the Washington Department of Financial Institutions to address proposed rules for money transmitters that expanded the meaning of money transmission to include the transmission of virtual currency. The bond?s existing condition requires the surety to secure the licensee?s compliance with this law. SFAA explained the risks in underwriting virtual currency transmissions due to the volatile fluctuations in the value of the currency. Virtual currency is subject to minimal regulation, is vulnerable to cyberattacks, and the accounts are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Underwriting these risks could increase the surety?s exposure by amounts that are difficult to quantify or identify so that the surety bond?s coverage should not be extended to cover them since it could negatively affect the bond?s availability.

Members should visit Advocacy / General Info (Members) for more information.

Draft Minutes from the following
recent meetings have been posted for Members:

• Fidelity Claims Advisory Committee meeting – January 24, 2018
• Board of Directors meeting – December 7, 2017
• Commercial Surety Advisory Committee meeting – December 6, 2017
• Fidelity/Fidelity Claims Advisory Committee meeting – November 8, 2017
• e-Business Advisory Committee conference call – October 4, 2017
• Diversity & Human Resources Advisory Committee meeting – September 28, 2017
• Actuarial Advisory Committee meeting – September 13, 2017
• Contract Bonds Advisory Committee meeting – September 13, 2017
• Government Affairs Advisory Committee meeting – September 13, 2017
• Communications Advisory Committee conference call – September 12, 2017
• Surety Claims Advisory Committee meeting – June 20, 2017
• Fidelity Advisory Committee meeting – May 10, 2017
• International Advisory Committee meeting – May 10, 2017
• Surety Claims / Corporate Counsel Advisory Committees meeting – January 18, 2017
• Joint Automation Committee meeting – September 24-25, 2015
• Statistical Advisory Committee meeting – September 2, 2015

Members should navigate to the Board and Committees section of the website for for additional information
about SFAA Board and Advisory Committees.

SFAA Objects to Proposed Montana Rules Eliminating Aggregate Liability Provision for Public Adjusters’ Bond

SFAA advised against a proposed rule from the Montana Commissioner of Securities and Insurance that would delete a provision limiting the surety’s aggregate liability to the bond amount for the bond required from public adjusters. SFAA noted that the proposed rules could affect the bond’s availability by increasing the surety’s financial exposure. The proposed rules state that the intent of the changes is to remove superfluous language without changing the meaning of the rule. Our comments noted that eliminating the limit on the surety’s aggregate liability could result in a material, unintended change as the statute does not limit the surety’s aggregate liability.

Members should visit Government Relations / General Info (Members) for more information.

SFAA Submits Recommendations on Oregon Mortgage Servicers License Bond Rules

SFAA made recommendations on the claims provisions to the Oregon Department of Consumer and Business Services concerning proposed rules for bonding mortgage loan servicers. The rules would require the bond to remain in place for five years after the mortgage servicer ceases to be licensed in the State. Direct actions also are permitted on the bond and claims must be filed before the bond expires. SFAA recommended that two or three years for the limitations period for claims would be more workable. SFAA also recommended that the limitations period to take action on the bond should begin when the surety cancels the bond or when the servicer ceases to be licensed, whichever occurs earlier. We recommended that the rules be clarified so that the claimant has a period of time after the bond is cancelled or the license period ends to make a claim, and that the claims period is not long that that it increases uncertainty for the surety, which could impact the availability of the bond.

The bond or letter of credit would have to be in an amount ranging from $50,000 to $200,000, based on the mortgage servicer’s total unpaid principal balance of residential mortgage loans in Oregon. SFAA did not comment on the bond amount specifically, but noted that a higher bond amount would require the bond principal to have greater financial resources based on the surety’s underwriting process.

Members should visit Government Relations / General Info (Members) for more information.

Federal Agency Withdraws Hard Rock Mining Rule

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will not adopt final regulations for its proposed financial responsibility requirements for hard rock mining operations for metals and non-metallic fuel minerals that SFAA opposed. Surety bonds would have been accepted to meet the requirement and SFAA noted that the bond requirement could have been duplicative of existing state and federal reclamation bonding requirements. We also opposed provisions that would have permitted direct actions on the bond. Other stakeholders also noted the potential for duplicative financial responsibility requirements and the potential problems with the direct action provisions. The EPA agreed with these concerns and will not move forward with its proposal.